Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-25 00:45:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D3FDF227E2991C7A188594CE4223A6A9C23081067B3272409F03D179D242B35
Participant Details

Original Note:

It wasn’t a smear campaign but natural public backlash after a 6-week trial with evidence that is still accessible, in which a jury unanimously ruled that Amber Heard defamed Johnny Depp with malicious falsehoods about abuse. The verdict legally affirms Depp’s innocence. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5Tkpm4fQICXN9A9o_Ru2KSmuSrI3COII&si=g4Qv5NtVSLRQTo4c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871335329451352446
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D3FDF227E2991C7A188594CE4223A6A9C23081067B3272409F03D179D242B35
  • createdAtMillis - 1735087518223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18713353294513524461D3FDF227E2991C7A188594CE4223A6A9C23081067B3272409F03D179D242B35