Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 02:58:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8FDC11074D66589EE16F6F121E5B6A98320829EFAA296A0F1945DAB982BFA9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Darmanin a reconnu les faits de pénétration buccale par contrainte, ce qui correspond à un viol. Le non-lieu était motivé par l'absence de preuve matérielle. https://www.marianne.net/politique/plainte-contre-darmanin-ses-avocats-ne-nient-pas-les-faits-mais-n-y-voient-pas-un-viol

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871309589120971084
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E8FDC11074D66589EE16F6F121E5B6A98320829EFAA296A0F1945DAB982BFA9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1735009132492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1871309589120971084E8FDC11074D66589EE16F6F121E5B6A98320829EFAA296A0F1945DAB982BFA9C