Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 15:56:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1871131597791277315 にある、裁判官は民意ではなく法律に基づいて判決を出すべきという意見に私も賛成します。 しかし、元の投稿の内容は個人の意見に過ぎないのでコミュニティノートは不要だと考えます。異論はあるかもしれませんが。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871213049006473445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1735055762773
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187121304900647344541DCA8F81962AAF954A8C60D049B05D9EAC4D1A1FD125F5691C989A080D053E6