Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 17:56:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1871131597791277315 にある、裁判官は民意ではなく法律に基づいて判決を出すべきという意見に私も賛成します。 しかし、元の投稿の内容は個人の意見に過ぎないのでコミュニティノートは不要だと考えます。異論はあるかもしれませんが。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871213049006473445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1735062995918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187121304900647344541A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE