Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 09:02:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 434382C4B71CE956A8917827C72E33E4DD0E39D4B2A52FFA66F60967FD1FD4DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

元草津町議の女性が虚偽の性被害告発を行った際、当該ポスト主はよく事実関係を調べる事もなく元町議の告発を応援し、草津町長と町議会を厳しく非難するコラムを発表しました。その後告発が虚偽であった事が判明しても当該ポスト主は自論の過ちを認めず謝罪もしていません。法理論に寄らず一時の感情だけで善悪を決めるのは危険です。 https://dot.asahi.com/articles/-/81107?page=1 https://dot.asahi.com/articles/-/81107?page=2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871039255113539811
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 434382C4B71CE956A8917827C72E33E4DD0E39D4B2A52FFA66F60967FD1FD4DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1734944552350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1871039255113539811434382C4B71CE956A8917827C72E33E4DD0E39D4B2A52FFA66F60967FD1FD4DE