Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 10:35:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FFE62D215D57322469C2B8723C457FA94E745C55EC4C67F125F290F1EB5E001
Participant Details

Original Note:

本ポストでは「裁判員制度は民意を判決に反映させるために導入された」と受け取れる記載がありますが、 裁判員制度は「国民の司法への理解を深める」が主な目的であり、 「民意を判決に反映させる」は少なくとも主目的とされていません。 https://www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/qa/index.html#c1_1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871014802417742282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FFE62D215D57322469C2B8723C457FA94E745C55EC4C67F125F290F1EB5E001
  • createdAtMillis - 1734950109873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18710148024177422829FFE62D215D57322469C2B8723C457FA94E745C55EC4C67F125F290F1EB5E001