Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 01:48:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2AFB7EE3F6AF5B32E0A29EF0DEF77B0CCAA39F7F7AE03B66CC8C26526BF2D33
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, this post contains a factually correct claim - the existence of one particular incident is irrelevant and has already be addressed. if you wish to be seen "dunking" on her for whatever reason, use the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870962516614099282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2AFB7EE3F6AF5B32E0A29EF0DEF77B0CCAA39F7F7AE03B66CC8C26526BF2D33
  • createdAtMillis - 1734918532390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870962516614099282C2AFB7EE3F6AF5B32E0A29EF0DEF77B0CCAA39F7F7AE03B66CC8C26526BF2D33