Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 02:00:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, this post contains a factually correct claim - the existence of one particular incident is irrelevant and has already be addressed. if you wish to be seen "dunking" on her for whatever reason, use the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870962516614099282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1734919221229
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187096251661409928283C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9