Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 01:41:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A809C0EF0047FE9BBBE6ED3E58E37D9EA6C022002F53734B89F5966B02F3174
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, this post contains a factually correct claim - the existence of one particular incident is irrelevant and has already be addressed. if you wish to be seen "dunking" on her for whatever reason, use the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870962516614099282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A809C0EF0047FE9BBBE6ED3E58E37D9EA6C022002F53734B89F5966B02F3174
  • createdAtMillis - 1734918093852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18709625166140992825A809C0EF0047FE9BBBE6ED3E58E37D9EA6C022002F53734B89F5966B02F3174