Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 05:56:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, this post contains a factually correct claim - the existence of one particular incident is irrelevant and has already be addressed. if you wish to be seen "dunking" on her for whatever reason, use the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870962516614099282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53
  • createdAtMillis - 1734933377266
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18709625166140992824EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53