Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 04:36:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 106D29A6BF91C89CA0EF7EC0A866472E5B9D3373C4C5F4C1938D0EE3EDDC1F15
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, this post contains a factually correct claim - the existence of one particular incident is irrelevant and has already be addressed. if you wish to be seen "dunking" on her for whatever reason, use the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870962516614099282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 106D29A6BF91C89CA0EF7EC0A866472E5B9D3373C4C5F4C1938D0EE3EDDC1F15
  • createdAtMillis - 1734928560995
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870962516614099282106D29A6BF91C89CA0EF7EC0A866472E5B9D3373C4C5F4C1938D0EE3EDDC1F15