Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 01:13:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note précédente est inutile, l’échantillon de 1680 personnes est déjà assez important pour représenter la population totale. Seul l’aspect spatial et les catégories d’âge sont importants dans ces études là.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870948177521873313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819
  • createdAtMillis - 1734916423923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870948177521873313E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819