Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 22:20:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB90024271E8B9D8BABA1032774830D99B0511A8F2264E15ECCCD5CC071F9DE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note précédente est inutile, l’échantillon de 1680 personnes est déjà assez important pour représenter la population totale. Seul l’aspect spatial et les catégories d’âge sont importants dans ces études là.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870948177521873313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB90024271E8B9D8BABA1032774830D99B0511A8F2264E15ECCCD5CC071F9DE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1734906009541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870948177521873313BB90024271E8B9D8BABA1032774830D99B0511A8F2264E15ECCCD5CC071F9DE7