Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 17:56:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B61230F427DF393179F32E4B5B3E914935A98B480CEE70A29CC5115C1A3A750A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note précédente est inutile, l’échantillon de 1680 personnes est déjà assez important pour représenter la population totale. Seul l’aspect spatial et les catégories d’âge sont importants dans ces études là.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870948177521873313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B61230F427DF393179F32E4B5B3E914935A98B480CEE70A29CC5115C1A3A750A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735062998504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870948177521873313B61230F427DF393179F32E4B5B3E914935A98B480CEE70A29CC5115C1A3A750A