Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 13:26:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59F5062AEBBCCA84B0B7F9242779FBE70C56DFC6988B0228FF74C57423077B81
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note précédente est inutile, l’échantillon de 1680 personnes est déjà assez important pour représenter la population totale. Seul l’aspect spatial et les catégories d’âge sont importants dans ces études là.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870948177521873313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59F5062AEBBCCA84B0B7F9242779FBE70C56DFC6988B0228FF74C57423077B81
  • createdAtMillis - 1734960415491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187094817752187331359F5062AEBBCCA84B0B7F9242779FBE70C56DFC6988B0228FF74C57423077B81