Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 17:02:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F6B76463F24B128443806368C270EB0BC30C93540A40B491B8BA50E6396D6C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note précédente est inutile, l’échantillon de 1680 personnes est déjà assez important pour représenter la population totale. Seul l’aspect spatial et les catégories d’âge sont importants dans ces études là.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870948177521873313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F6B76463F24B128443806368C270EB0BC30C93540A40B491B8BA50E6396D6C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1734973353159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18709481775218733132F6B76463F24B128443806368C270EB0BC30C93540A40B491B8BA50E6396D6C6