Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 19:21:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 530CF7099862F2D9709E9118A8876C60139F098D850065E6415FC46B0F874EF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post only says that it was drafted by a lobby organisation, not that it was enacted by it. And the post only describes a fact, that she was rearrested. That anyone would be rearrested is entirly irrelevant. And you can be against the law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870714992632238404
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 530CF7099862F2D9709E9118A8876C60139F098D850065E6415FC46B0F874EF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1734895260122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870714992632238404530CF7099862F2D9709E9118A8876C60139F098D850065E6415FC46B0F874EF9