Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 04:57:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E5A76B18FEA53F94F234D9E98AD489149FF4258726B6D5D6E47342C53F88E30
Participant Details

Original Note:

事裁判には推定無罪の原則が存在します。疑わしきは被告人の利益に 、が基本の考え方です。 https://niben.jp/right/keiji/saibanin/faq.html 12月18日の大阪高裁の判決に関して女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていると報道されています https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://news.ntv.co.jp/n/ytv/category/society/ytdb4854e1c80e466ea639c849929bf927

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870684157686546613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E5A76B18FEA53F94F234D9E98AD489149FF4258726B6D5D6E47342C53F88E30
  • createdAtMillis - 1734843476934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18706841576865466132E5A76B18FEA53F94F234D9E98AD489149FF4258726B6D5D6E47342C53F88E30