Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 03:52:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97845E5523F399E8D6A4A1A0F8D48359E3A62D7E8118BEE19B27A5A10F503D0A
Participant Details

Original Note:

事裁判には推定無罪の原則が存在します。疑わしきは被告人の利益に 、が基本の考え方です。 https://niben.jp/right/keiji/saibanin/faq.html 12月18日の大阪高裁の判決に関して女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていると報道されています https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://news.ntv.co.jp/n/ytv/category/society/ytdb4854e1c80e466ea639c849929bf927

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870683534387732874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97845E5523F399E8D6A4A1A0F8D48359E3A62D7E8118BEE19B27A5A10F503D0A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735617124084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 187068353438773287497845E5523F399E8D6A4A1A0F8D48359E3A62D7E8118BEE19B27A5A10F503D0A