Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 16:51:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07CD5CF1D7F8566B76426AC89CF0EF40154AC46F00E3473C6CFE1ED32062E730
Participant Details

Original Note:

事裁判には推定無罪の原則が存在します。疑わしきは被告人の利益に 、が基本の考え方です。 https://niben.jp/right/keiji/saibanin/faq.html 12月18日の大阪高裁の判決に関して女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていると報道されています https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870682688673468564
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07CD5CF1D7F8566B76426AC89CF0EF40154AC46F00E3473C6CFE1ED32062E730
  • createdAtMillis - 1734886301757
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187068268867346856407CD5CF1D7F8566B76426AC89CF0EF40154AC46F00E3473C6CFE1ED32062E730