Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-23 06:48:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3087FAD65AAB36F4864098C21F5B67D1AAE302D65C9E079D6AFBB36F0D6D8A92
Participant Details

Original Note:

投稿者は被害者の発言を性交に対する「不同意」である旨喧伝しておりますが、問題の刑事裁判は「不同意性交」ではなく、2023年7月の法改正以前の「強制性交」による訴訟であります。 飯島裁判長が「不同意性交」に対して無罪判決を出した、という誤解を招く投稿であり、注意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870656468258865290
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3087FAD65AAB36F4864098C21F5B67D1AAE302D65C9E079D6AFBB36F0D6D8A92
  • createdAtMillis - 1734936519432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18706564682588652903087FAD65AAB36F4864098C21F5B67D1AAE302D65C9E079D6AFBB36F0D6D8A92