Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 23:02:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5FC8269E9D6510AC89A8DDB1EA74DFD4F9C752F9E8C47E98C3EB3754D69EB57
Participant Details

Original Note:

刑事裁判には推定無罪の原則が存在します。疑わしきは被告人の利益に 、が基本の考え方です。 https://niben.jp/right/keiji/saibanin/faq.html 12月18日の大阪高裁の判決に関して女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていると報道されています https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870618507987362080
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5FC8269E9D6510AC89A8DDB1EA74DFD4F9C752F9E8C47E98C3EB3754D69EB57
  • createdAtMillis - 1734908536389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870618507987362080F5FC8269E9D6510AC89A8DDB1EA74DFD4F9C752F9E8C47E98C3EB3754D69EB57