Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 23:24:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

高裁判決では女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていること、暴行、脅迫に当たる言動が認められないと判決で述べていることに留意しましょう https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870501136983331159
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1734909884984
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1870501136983331159C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0