Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-22 08:15:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D2EC72259F92A9A193E3736F5F1E51C4B17A5CB123B5AEED2D715C4A1119C58
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判官訴追委員会の弾劾制度の利用を念頭に置いているようですが、個別の判決や訴訟指揮についてはこの制度の対象とはなりません。 https://www.sotsui.go.jp/system/index3.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870492704188277007
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D2EC72259F92A9A193E3736F5F1E51C4B17A5CB123B5AEED2D715C4A1119C58
  • createdAtMillis - 1734855308067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18704927041882770074D2EC72259F92A9A193E3736F5F1E51C4B17A5CB123B5AEED2D715C4A1119C58