Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 06:47:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判官訴追委員会の弾劾制度の利用を念頭に置いているようですが、個別の判決や訴訟指揮についてはこの制度の対象とはなりません。 https://www.sotsui.go.jp/system/index3.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870492704188277007
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044
  • createdAtMillis - 1735022836571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870492704188277007293AE22F8701C637E5A9EEEFF2600FCBD94816FA14ADD3B9BB4FF0F6EC8DF044