Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-21 13:01:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD50C7F8AAF51F5F7CD1698F02817605710709A9372847DBA1906A1EA8B300E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This ruling was based on legal technicalities and does not equate to a declaration of Lizzo’s innocence regarding the allegations.  The court identified that the legal case should’ve been presented against Lizzo’s touring company “Big Grrrl Big Touring Inc.” (the employer). https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnwynejd5o

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870447720252518483
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD50C7F8AAF51F5F7CD1698F02817605710709A9372847DBA1906A1EA8B300E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1734786078007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870447720252518483AD50C7F8AAF51F5F7CD1698F02817605710709A9372847DBA1906A1EA8B300E9