Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 00:33:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4B1CE8C3915F9E1D7FE9F43770A20234F7CC9780C4E13429174EE3E0D25264D
Participant Details

Original Note:

当時の改正前の強制性交等罪に照らすと、有罪と断定するための事実や証拠が不十分だったという判決です。 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html https://x.com/takeshibengo/status/1869615818201530602?t=V6rt-HiXk1URNfq1iMThzw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870386576913739934
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4B1CE8C3915F9E1D7FE9F43770A20234F7CC9780C4E13429174EE3E0D25264D
  • createdAtMillis - 1735000421456
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1870386576913739934F4B1CE8C3915F9E1D7FE9F43770A20234F7CC9780C4E13429174EE3E0D25264D