Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-21 05:43:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18F86E6ACBC2034ECF3C6B7C7F2200E75664B3138F8CE543BBAFA5AE0E6A86E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

刑事裁判には推定無罪の原則が存在します。疑わしきは被告人の利益に 、が基本の考え方です。 https://niben.jp/right/keiji/saibanin/faq.html 12月18日の大阪高裁の判決に関して女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていると報道されています https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870308977206276314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18F86E6ACBC2034ECF3C6B7C7F2200E75664B3138F8CE543BBAFA5AE0E6A86E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1734759836846
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187030897720627631418F86E6ACBC2034ECF3C6B7C7F2200E75664B3138F8CE543BBAFA5AE0E6A86E4