Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-21 08:03:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C62C5FBF6C5EA21AC1B08ABC33A5ABC65D1E30EE0B015D66D85EA82E30BFF9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

高裁判決では女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていること、暴行、脅迫に当たる言動が認められないと判決で述べていることに留意しましょう https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870282212027052176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C62C5FBF6C5EA21AC1B08ABC33A5ABC65D1E30EE0B015D66D85EA82E30BFF9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1734768213280
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18702822120270521763C62C5FBF6C5EA21AC1B08ABC33A5ABC65D1E30EE0B015D66D85EA82E30BFF9C