Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-21 23:55:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 378B0BC229952AB8C91AF4925B22BB2CE42BA263E3CB7302D9902A1C12FECE43
Participant Details

Original Note:

高裁判決では女性の被害供述の信用性が疑問視されていること、暴行、脅迫に当たる言動が認められないと判決で述べていることに留意しましょう https://www.sankei.com/article/20241218-C2Z6GUGIPFNOBOSRRNP55A2DN4/ https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/ytv/nation/ytv-2024121808795566.html https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/otsu/20241218/2060017254.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870282212027052176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 378B0BC229952AB8C91AF4925B22BB2CE42BA263E3CB7302D9902A1C12FECE43
  • createdAtMillis - 1734825303948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870282212027052176378B0BC229952AB8C91AF4925B22BB2CE42BA263E3CB7302D9902A1C12FECE43