Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 20:57:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F27D02DB14526AB6D23E3082838796D761E15EC60264093A656C32BCD182C073
Participant Details

Original Note:

Newsom did not claim the money is "missing", the author of an article for The Independent did. A state audit indicated that two programs are "likely cost-effective", and that for the remaining $9.4B of the $24B, there is not enough data to fully assess the cost-effectiveness. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/gavin-newsom-homeless-money-budget-b2544347.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1870165372999258549
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F27D02DB14526AB6D23E3082838796D761E15EC60264093A656C32BCD182C073
createdAtMillis - 1734728252870
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1870165372999258549F27D02DB14526AB6D23E3082838796D761E15EC60264093A656C32BCD182C073