Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 15:53:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB9091C5225785C074A53A3601E1A8732C10E2D7E6544A301CA920F3B76D2D82
Participant Details

Original Note:

1) They went to court in 2015 for this, came out clean. 2) They came out clean in 2017 when it brought up again. The reporter had to publicly apologize as well. 3) There is no official documents used as source and just words from mouth of anonymous so called "representative" https://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/16822840.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870113603153506394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB9091C5225785C074A53A3601E1A8732C10E2D7E6544A301CA920F3B76D2D82
  • createdAtMillis - 1734710009274
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870113603153506394CB9091C5225785C074A53A3601E1A8732C10E2D7E6544A301CA920F3B76D2D82