Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-21 02:03:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 358A7337E35203924DB5E201C3E71D38009BF27EA719D634456E9205A6A61F14
Participant Details

Original Note:

1) They went to court in 2015 for this, came out clean. 2) They came out clean in 2017 when it brought up again. The reporter had to publicly apologize as well. 3) There is no official documents used as source and just words from mouth of anonymous so called "representative" https://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/16822840.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870113603153506394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 358A7337E35203924DB5E201C3E71D38009BF27EA719D634456E9205A6A61F14
  • createdAtMillis - 1734746594214
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870113603153506394358A7337E35203924DB5E201C3E71D38009BF27EA719D634456E9205A6A61F14