Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 19:30:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 020C2A258DE2877C6403FD93A8488601090C2FE95C5F3FAECF8A2107FE0BB669
Participant Details

Original Note:

1) They went to court in 2015 for this, came out clean. 2) They came out clean in 2017 when it brought up again. The reporter had to publicly apologize as well. 3) There is no official documents used as source and just words from mouth of anonymous so called "representative" https://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/16822840.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870113603153506394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 020C2A258DE2877C6403FD93A8488601090C2FE95C5F3FAECF8A2107FE0BB669
  • createdAtMillis - 1734723047903
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1870113603153506394020C2A258DE2877C6403FD93A8488601090C2FE95C5F3FAECF8A2107FE0BB669