Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 14:49:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57D580A9FA7389AD1DDFA1F9E3C0C6A9CA5AC1A7616B52713734844511D96AA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

בניגוד לטענה של רוטמן צו בית המשפט אינו קשור לבורקס פינוקים או לכל פינוק אחר אלא לקיום החוק שמחייב תנאי מחיה בסיסים. לכן גם הטענה שלו בנוגע להודאת הדוברת היא שקרית https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/local/838102/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1870032758120017924
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57D580A9FA7389AD1DDFA1F9E3C0C6A9CA5AC1A7616B52713734844511D96AA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1734706184713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187003275812001792457D580A9FA7389AD1DDFA1F9E3C0C6A9CA5AC1A7616B52713734844511D96AA9