Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 17:40:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 767960D0CB07C060C940FAE4842DE977265C7A7571113B62ED55F858926ABB4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: People can read the underlying report and determine the likelihood of the OP’s claim, but the operative word is “may.” OP doesn’t claim that it does or does not. This is OP’s opinion, not a scientific claim. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.14.22276401v1.full-text

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869934554300956719
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 767960D0CB07C060C940FAE4842DE977265C7A7571113B62ED55F858926ABB4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734716406866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869934554300956719767960D0CB07C060C940FAE4842DE977265C7A7571113B62ED55F858926ABB4D