Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 04:08:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline and clarified that the AFR did not intend to infer that energy economist Danny Price is dishonest. The AFR issued an apology to Mr Price for any misunderstanding. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869925597486690771
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97
createdAtMillis - 1734667692982
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1869925597486690771F95F523EAAB303B2E6CDC274AAE8627603890B6B02AA027D7D04665F33156B97