Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 07:44:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline and clarified that the AFR did not intend to infer that energy economist Danny Price is dishonest. The AFR issued an apology to Mr Price for any misunderstanding. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869925597486690771
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65
  • createdAtMillis - 1734680686509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1869925597486690771C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65