Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 02:49:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A58457BDEC778400B68669B53EBD1E36414B07B5513D7C4BF4871D7AD9FE1FFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Australian Financial Review has since amended its headline and clarified that the AFR did not intend to infer that energy economist Danny Price is dishonest. The AFR issued an apology to Mr Price for any misunderstanding. https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/economics-of-coalition-s-nuclear-modelling-are-worth-nothing-20241214-p5kydg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869925597486690771
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A58457BDEC778400B68669B53EBD1E36414B07B5513D7C4BF4871D7AD9FE1FFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1734662995167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1869925597486690771A58457BDEC778400B68669B53EBD1E36414B07B5513D7C4BF4871D7AD9FE1FFB