Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 04:21:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

タイトルや本文にある通り、効果は伝統的な金融政策手段に比べて「不確実」と分析しているため失敗とはみなされていません。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUB182GV0Y4A211C2000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869918400899912138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1734668461013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1869918400899912138C4FD0EBFC13720D730ED760181BD963110BA070F6025852BFB208A0D970287D0