Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 10:21:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECA6B56AD100B56AD42E2B47250D4522477F1C55438D8CA3F4D5FE859C304E59
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que el informe de la UCO desmienta la acusación del posible delito. Al revés, al haber sido borrados los mensajes en los días claves, puede ser prueba de su interés en ocultarlos. Además siguen habiendo indicios claves en el correo del fiscal. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/12/19/67642ee9e85ece241d8b456d.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869885142979784942
participantId -
raterParticipantId - ECA6B56AD100B56AD42E2B47250D4522477F1C55438D8CA3F4D5FE859C304E59
createdAtMillis - 1734690095255
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1869885142979784942ECA6B56AD100B56AD42E2B47250D4522477F1C55438D8CA3F4D5FE859C304E59