Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 19:58:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7271A352C28D3ACA42639789CC9A871145C05C7EFD6E0D0F6FD5E61742EFFB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que el informe de la UCO desmienta la acusación del posible delito. Al revés, al haber sido borrados los mensajes en los días claves, puede ser prueba de su interés en ocultarlos. Además siguen habiendo indicios claves en el correo del fiscal. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/12/19/67642ee9e85ece241d8b456d.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869885142979784942
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E7271A352C28D3ACA42639789CC9A871145C05C7EFD6E0D0F6FD5E61742EFFB3
createdAtMillis - 1734724720988
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1869885142979784942E7271A352C28D3ACA42639789CC9A871145C05C7EFD6E0D0F6FD5E61742EFFB3