Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 09:04:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que el informe de la UCO desmienta la acusación del posible delito. Al revés, al haber sido borrados los mensajes en los días claves, puede ser prueba de su interés en ocultarlos. Además siguen habiendo indicios claves en el correo del fiscal. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/12/19/67642ee9e85ece241d8b456d.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869885142979784942
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834
createdAtMillis - 1734685483338
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18698851429797849426428F51DC8897F94376A0C3A0CF3EE231E5F7227883268F90E67655A6D1AC834