Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 17:33:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 434FB142E1E45AB95E0DF3DD958BBE32C99B5FB9B16E4A946D845A8CE3D4F8AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que el informe de la UCO desmienta la acusación del posible delito. Al revés, al haber sido borrados los mensajes en los días claves, puede ser prueba de su interés en ocultarlos. Además siguen habiendo indicios claves en el correo del fiscal. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/12/19/67642ee9e85ece241d8b456d.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869885142979784942
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 434FB142E1E45AB95E0DF3DD958BBE32C99B5FB9B16E4A946D845A8CE3D4F8AA
createdAtMillis - 1734716036012
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1869885142979784942434FB142E1E45AB95E0DF3DD958BBE32C99B5FB9B16E4A946D845A8CE3D4F8AA