Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-20 10:07:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25A209C97CDD97F6377C9AB38CC1E31624A4B21E890D570E4E9152F0BC8B2EDC
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es cierto que el informe de la UCO desmienta la acusación del posible delito. Al revés, al haber sido borrados los mensajes en los días claves, puede ser prueba de su interés en ocultarlos. Además siguen habiendo indicios claves en el correo del fiscal. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/12/19/67642ee9e85ece241d8b456d.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869885142979784942
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 25A209C97CDD97F6377C9AB38CC1E31624A4B21E890D570E4E9152F0BC8B2EDC
createdAtMillis - 1734689233272
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186988514297978494225A209C97CDD97F6377C9AB38CC1E31624A4B21E890D570E4E9152F0BC8B2EDC