Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 21:36:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A97BC60B4B630E4DFDE19F8EF349231DAACFC2CB112385BDB81919F10BFFF337
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esto es falso, el auto dela @CIDH dice lo siguiente: RESUELVE: 1. Declarar improcedente la solicitud de adopción de medidas provisionales presentada por los representantes de la víctima en el presente caso. https://corteidh.or.cr/docs/medidas/petrourrego_se_03.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869829456568963329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A97BC60B4B630E4DFDE19F8EF349231DAACFC2CB112385BDB81919F10BFFF337
  • createdAtMillis - 1734644203608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1869829456568963329A97BC60B4B630E4DFDE19F8EF349231DAACFC2CB112385BDB81919F10BFFF337