Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 20:13:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E843C98DA88F0213F0C8C45BB1824DA337170DEC939C3A2E2432B258D740F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esto es falso, el auto dela @CIDH dice lo siguiente: RESUELVE: 1. Declarar improcedente la solicitud de adopción de medidas provisionales presentada por los representantes de la víctima en el presente caso. https://corteidh.or.cr/docs/medidas/petrourrego_se_03.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1869829456568963329
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E843C98DA88F0213F0C8C45BB1824DA337170DEC939C3A2E2432B258D740F4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734639231339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18698294565689633298E843C98DA88F0213F0C8C45BB1824DA337170DEC939C3A2E2432B258D740F4D