Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 18:35:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claims funds went to a firm, that employs his wife. That does not mean she directly financially benefited from it. It actually indicates the opposite, saying her work is separate from any work done on his campaign. https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/17/tara-dan-crenshaw-campaign-marketing-firm-wife-pink-cilantro-fec-records/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869780104047362410
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED
createdAtMillis - 1734633354199
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1869780104047362410801EF47667BB4A265482C460A08B6BB8CD8D4399730F8E355209F79C3722D4ED