Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 19:26:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47AD94ABAFAC7A675127AF5AD099DA53591B2F0CAC753A131959C56CB615BC5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claims funds went to a firm, that employs his wife. That does not mean she directly financially benefited from it. It actually indicates the opposite, saying her work is separate from any work done on his campaign. https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/17/tara-dan-crenshaw-campaign-marketing-firm-wife-pink-cilantro-fec-records/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869780104047362410
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 47AD94ABAFAC7A675127AF5AD099DA53591B2F0CAC753A131959C56CB615BC5F
createdAtMillis - 1734636418305
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186978010404736241047AD94ABAFAC7A675127AF5AD099DA53591B2F0CAC753A131959C56CB615BC5F