Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 23:26:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32BEDA45B7C242477E803D0DB0B8FEAEC0EB6E52ACCFC19A9C016F54CF7BCE1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article claims funds went to a firm, that employs his wife. That does not mean she directly financially benefited from it. It actually indicates the opposite, saying her work is separate from any work done on his campaign. https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/17/tara-dan-crenshaw-campaign-marketing-firm-wife-pink-cilantro-fec-records/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1869780104047362410
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 32BEDA45B7C242477E803D0DB0B8FEAEC0EB6E52ACCFC19A9C016F54CF7BCE1F
createdAtMillis - 1734650793978
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 186978010404736241032BEDA45B7C242477E803D0DB0B8FEAEC0EB6E52ACCFC19A9C016F54CF7BCE1F